The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. COVID-19
  5. Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down

Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?

  • 92 Replies
  • 18621 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #20 on: 03/11/2020 19:46:10 »
There is an old saying that politics is the art of the possible. Trump is dismantling 200 years of civilisation by doing what is possible. Politics, but bad politics.

A better adage is that good politics is the art of choosing between the unpalatable and the unacceptable. National quarantine is unpalatable; destruction of the economy, permitting endemic disease and burdening future generations with an unpayable debt is unacceptable.

So far, only the New Zealand government seems to have imposed the unpalatable and thus averted the unacceptable. 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #21 on: 03/11/2020 19:55:36 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 03/11/2020 19:46:10
So far, only the New Zealand government seems to have imposed the unpalatable and thus averted the unacceptable. 
I think that China has (at least officially) done the same.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #22 on: 03/11/2020 20:00:55 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 03/11/2020 19:38:22
Which  hole did you pull this from Alan,
The Swedish government statistics that you led me to. Thanks.

Excess deaths in Sweden is just over 5000 for 2020, in a population of 10,000,000: 0.05%

Excess deaths in UK is about  55,000 for 2020, in a population of 67,000,000: 0.08%

Given the much lower population density of Sweden (less than one tenth of the UK) that isn't particularly impressive..

Excess deaths in New Zealand to date: -1200, population 4,800,000: - 0.025%. Yes, NEGATIVE excess deaths compared with the 5 year average. Now that's impressive, even when you include the known 26 COVID deaths.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #23 on: 03/11/2020 20:35:47 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 03/11/2020 19:46:10
There is an old saying that politics is the art of the possible. Trump is dismantling 200 years of civilisation by doing what is possible. Politics, but bad politics.

A better adage is that good politics is the art of choosing between the unpalatable and the unacceptable. National quarantine is unpalatable; destruction of the economy, permitting endemic disease and burdening future generations with an unpayable debt is unacceptable.

So far, only the New Zealand government seems to have imposed the unpalatable and thus averted the unacceptable. 
Back in your rat hole again?
Quote from: alancalverd on 03/11/2020 20:00:55
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 03/11/2020 19:38:22
Which  hole did you pull this from Alan,
The Swedish government statistics that you led me to. Thanks.

Excess deaths in Sweden is just over 5000 for 2020, in a population of 10,000,000: 0.05%

Excess deaths in UK is about  55,000 for 2020, in a population of 67,000,000: 0.08%

Given the much lower population density of Sweden (less than one tenth of the UK) that isn't particularly impressive..

Excess deaths in New Zealand to date: -1200, population 4,800,000: - 0.025%. Yes, NEGATIVE excess deaths compared with the 5 year average. Now that's impressive, even when you include the known 26 COVID deaths.
Back in you're rat hole! Canadas population density far lower than both yet isn't any better, doesn't quite add upp.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_median_age

Quote
87% of Swedes live in urban areas, which cover 1.5% of the entire land area.
« Last Edit: 03/11/2020 20:39:46 by Petrochemicals »
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #24 on: 03/11/2020 21:38:14 »
Interesting thing about population density.
It's not clear how much difference it makes.
Within a city (or even a big town) the population density is usually relatively similar regardless of where you are in the world. Once the virus is in a city it spreads through it.
So a major factor is how well one city is connected to the next.
And then there's the interesting question of sub-populations.
Students are a really good example of that.
So, before you rant at eachother any further, I trust you will incorporate those into your models.

It might look more scientific if you left the rats out of it. They don't seem to be a significant vector.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #25 on: 03/11/2020 22:36:34 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 03/11/2020 20:35:47
Canadas population density far lower than both yet isn't any better

To be fair, dividing Canada's population by its land area will give a misleading figure for population density because the majority of Canadians live near their southern border.
Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #26 on: 03/11/2020 23:03:07 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 03/11/2020 22:36:34
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 03/11/2020 20:35:47
Canadas population density far lower than both yet isn't any better

To be fair, dividing Canada's population by its land area will give a misleading figure for population density because the majority of Canadians live near their southern border.
That was the point!?! It's the amount of urbanisation.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #27 on: 03/11/2020 23:18:42 »
I mentioned urban interconnectivity several months ago, when comparing the rates of spread of COVID between the USA and UK. Intercity commuting is far more common in the UK, say between Manchester and Liverpool, Birmingham-Coventry-Leicester, Leeds and York, Glasgow and Edinburgh, than between similar sized conurbations in the USA.  At the time I discussed it, COVID hadn't really become fashionable throughout the USA, but with a bit of Presidential approval it has really taken off in those states and cities where Freedom overrides common sense.

Population density does vary between cities. Singapore, at 8000 persons per square kilometer is denser than London, at 5700 or Stockholm (5000) and vastly outstrips Birmingham at 1700.

With half the population of Sweden, Singapore (with a very comprehensive testing program) is now running at about 10 COVID cases per day compared with 1000 in Sweden. Adjusted for population, Sweden is moving into the premier league with the UK at 10,000.

https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus is very thorough but unfortunately only covers diagnosed cases and COVID-listed deaths, so it's a bit sketchy in countries with no comprehensive testing, and still dependent on the fashion for reporting COVID as cause of death. 

I remain completely baffled by the reference to rats, and despite the renowned national sense of irreverent humor,  the suggestion that the Sveriges Regeringen statistical service takes the piss out of itself seems unlikely.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #28 on: 04/11/2020 01:15:17 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 03/11/2020 23:18:42
. 

I remain completely baffled by the reference to rats, and despite the renowned national sense of irreverent humor,  the suggestion that the Sveriges Regeringen statistical service takes the piss out of itself seems unlikely.

Avoiding the point and posting unrelated crap whilst feigning ignorange.

 As in above missing the point about taking the piss, Canadas obvious low population density, but high cases despite testing and social distancing. Then waffling on about Singapore or trump in a way that avoids and creates subdifuge around the point of sweden doing rather well despite no masks and lockdown as in the title of the thread despite earlier having posted much to dispute it.

To duck down a rat hole - to do/say something underhand/questionable/untrue and then to dissappear from account. To behave as a rat.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #29 on: 04/11/2020 09:34:08 »
To return to the OP. They provably work, but only if you wear them properly.

If you don't understand statistics, I can't help you.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8061
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 305 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #30 on: 05/11/2020 08:36:43 »
Quote from: likehumansdo on 29/10/2020 09:45:02
So far as I can see it is strongly assumed, that the seriousness of the infection depends on how much of the virus you are exposed to. People with less exposure also have less sympoms or are even asymptomatic.

This cannot be the whole story because most of the Covid-19 casualties are elderly, obese men. There is no reason why exposure should be higher in these individuals specifically and not among younger, female, non-obese groups.
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #31 on: 05/11/2020 10:05:13 »
At low doses we are looking at the difference between a stochastic risk and a deterministic risk. These are more familiar in the context of radiation harm:

The probability of stochastic  harm depends on the dose, but the outcome depends on the victim. Small doses of ionising radiation increase the probability of expressing cancer, but once you have a viable cluster of mutated cells (viability probably depends on the physiology of the victim) the outcome depends on where it is, not the dose that induced it.  There is a latency period (growth with no clinical symptoms) and there is no inherent recovery process.

The harm from a large dose of ionising radiation is determined by a threshold, beyond which the harm is inevitable and the target cannot spontaneously recover - burn or epilation. Above threshold the harm is proportional to dose and fairly independent of the target. The response is rapid (no latency) and confined to the irradiated area, but if the area is small the inherent trauma repair process may result in containment and survival.

Viral infection generally mirrors stochastic rather than deterministic harm. One photon or one virus might strike lucky,  a whole army is more likely to succeed, and the patient outcome would be the same in either case. A mask reduces the number of inhaled or broadcast infective particles and thus the probability of acquiring or transmitting the infection, but not the consequence of doing so
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #32 on: 05/11/2020 10:39:34 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 04/11/2020 01:15:17
creates subdifuge
I think you just created that word.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #33 on: 05/11/2020 10:42:07 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 04/11/2020 01:15:17
Then waffling on about Singapore
Pointing out that, by most sensible measures, Singapore is doing very well in this crisis, is not "waffle".
It's an indication of where we should look for good practice.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #34 on: 05/11/2020 11:18:15 »
I think "subdifuge" may have come from the infamous PhD thesis that led to the disastrous invasion of Iraq: SUBterranean DIffusion and centgriFUGE plant for uranium enrichment.

It's a neat word, but AFAIK these are located in Iran, not Iraq, and you wouldn't expect a US president to know the difference.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #35 on: 05/11/2020 11:22:50 »
Quote from: chris on 28/09/2020 09:51:28
People don't wear masks at home, and I cannot see anyone realistically entertaining that prospect in the near future.
When I were a lad, we wore gas masks whenever the sirens sounded. Seriously impeded the ingestion of jellied eels or tripe, depending on where you lived.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #36 on: 05/11/2020 12:55:12 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 05/11/2020 11:18:15
you wouldn't expect a US president to know
That's a terrifyingly long list.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline set fair

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 467
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #37 on: 05/11/2020 17:40:12 »
I understand population-weighted  density is a better metric than simply density. It measures how far, on average, people are from their nearest neighbour... I think, perhaps somebody can elaborate.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #38 on: 05/11/2020 18:14:01 »
Even that isn't a great metric since the probability of A infecting B decreases roughly with the inverse square of the distance between them when A exhales. I live 5000 miles from one of my clients and thoroughly enjoyed my visits but we don't meet in the factory these days in  case someone breathes over someone else in the boardroom! 

On a more sensible scale, the population density in the London suburbs is fairly low but the probability of infection on a commuter train into the city is quite high.  Inter-urban commuting is a significant epidemiologial variable, and there's a lot more in the UK than in many other countries.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Why are face coverings not working against coronavirus?
« Reply #39 on: 05/11/2020 23:48:04 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 05/11/2020 11:18:15
I think "subdifuge" may have come from the infamous PhD thesis that led to the disastrous invasion of Iraq: SUBterranean DIffusion and centgriFUGE plant for uranium enrichment.

It's a neat word, but AFAIK these are located in Iran, not Iraq, and you wouldn't expect a US president to know the difference.
I'm guessing BC is posting BS again for you.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.497 seconds with 74 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.