0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Nobody reads them
you getting a bit like a new Stalin, in your bossiness.No offence meant. I do appreciate the power of your intellect. But don't overdo it. Only the moderators have power to eject people.
He says it there in black and white a NOBODY KNEW WHAT THE FLU VIRUS WAS.
Can't someone cease to engage with you, without being forced to leave the forum?
I'm fairly sure that the forum rules require you to respond (sensibly) to a reasonable comment or question; otherwise it's preaching.
In particular, it's perfectly plausible that blood samples taken at (or just after) the games would have been kept and might have been analysed.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/03/2021 21:00:49I'm fairly sure that the forum rules require you to respond (sensibly) to a reasonable comment or question; otherwise it's preaching.If the other moderators want to enforce that, they can feel free to. I will not, as I don't see any sense in disciplining someone for not responding to a member that they are ignoring using a feature of the forum designed specifically to do exactly that.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/03/2021 21:53:26In particular, it's perfectly plausible that blood samples taken at (or just after) the games would have been kept and might have been analysed.I have read reports that this same type of post analysis of samples was used in Italy to identify the realistic time the virus entered the country.
that is the case it would be compelled speech.
Recently published Politco Article speaks of the Wuhan Laboratory as the most likley source of Covid19https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/08/josh-rogin-chaos-under-heaven-wuhan-lab-book-excerpt-474322Article talk about how diplomats in 2017 and 2018 had expressed concerns about the Wuhan Laboratory in terms of its activities and safety standards. All of which is rather hilarious when the American Laboratory also engaged in the same research actually had a leak and was closed yet isnt even mentioned.
Quote from: Colin2B on 11/03/2021 23:19:05I have read reports that this same type of post analysis of samples was used in Italy to identify the realistic time the virus entered the country.Do you have any links to this information? I've only seen sewage samples.
I have read reports that this same type of post analysis of samples was used in Italy to identify the realistic time the virus entered the country.
A test taken months later could only be inconclusive.
You dont know that, more assumptions, the standards for civilian games are not the same for the military.
And scientists could still have conducted experiments on people sick with influenza. His claim is that experimentation was Impossible because flu had not been identified.
scientists at the turn of the 1900s could have been taking people sick with flu and housing them with healthy people, then when the healthy people became sick with flu, take the most serve case, and repeated the process, until someone died.
Still with 80% with low or mild symptoms having a low R0 and 20% with more severe symptoms a higher one, seems the best answer.
08:51:40
Quote from: Jolly2 on 12/03/2021 11:56:20Recently published Politco Article speaks of the Wuhan Laboratory as the most likley source of Covid19https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/08/josh-rogin-chaos-under-heaven-wuhan-lab-book-excerpt-474322Article talk about how diplomats in 2017 and 2018 had expressed concerns about the Wuhan Laboratory in terms of its activities and safety standards. All of which is rather hilarious when the American Laboratory also engaged in the same research actually had a leak and was closed yet isnt even mentioned.Wuhan, I can see why this is in new theories.
Quote from: Jolly2 on 06/03/2021 18:58:34Still with 80% with low or mild symptoms having a low R0 and 20% with more severe symptoms a higher one, seems the best answer. No it's the otherway round. People who get sick stay at home, people who don't get sick are out and about spreading the infection.