[talanum1 (OP)]

What does that mean, exactly?

The particle disappears from space and enters the mind of the observer.

So before people existed your "model" would not be true?

The mind of God existed.

Just checking, are you nutz?

No.

[Bored chemist]

The mind of God existed.

There goes the neighbourhood.
We can close the thread now. The OP has admitted that it's not science.

[Origin]

The particle disappears from space and enters the mind of the observer.

That is going to be rather difficult to show mathematically...

[puppypower]

This may help. Consider radioactive decay and the concept of half-life. This decay of atomic matter is dependent on time, but not necessarily distance. Half life does not have the units of space-time; d-t,, but only time; t, since the affect called radioactive decay is not dependent on any position in space-time. It has time potential; time driven change, not dependent on space.

The problem becomes trying to define time potential, in the context of space-time, for an affect that is not of itself, defined within space-time. Energy has wavelength and frequency; d-t, but half-life would be like a photon with frequency, but no wavelength. It is not exactly a photon of energy. It appears to us in space-time, as a timed change of state, but its nature of time is not properly integrated with space like space-time or defined by just energy. The term time potential allows one to isolate this affect.

An interesting affect is say we took neutral materials like steel, that are not radioactive, and use this to build a nuclear reactor. After some time encasing an active reactor, these steel housing materials will exhibit the time phenomena; radioactive decay.

In the case of fissionable materials, like uranium, critical geometry, which is a function of mass and distance/volume, will be used to alter the rate of radioactive decay of the fuel rods. Time potential is being enhanced; the rate of decay speed up, through changes in distance and mass, which are not time dependent. The rate of decay is dependent on the final mass geometry; mass and distance. Critical geometry with more mass and smaller volume leads to more radioactive decay. m-d ---->t.

Mass and distance potential can be used to alter time potential. While the time potential associated with the enhanced radioactive decay, can be transferred to the encasement matter. This will create hazardous half-life materials, with installed time potential, that can take millions of years to express at any geometry.

When I say acceleration is d//t/t or two parts time and one part distance, there is more units of time than just the time needed for space-time. Radioactive decay, is one such expression of a second type of time, not directed needed for space-time, since radioactive decay is not a function of relative space reference. Same in all references.


   

[Kryptid]

The particle disappears from space and enters the mind of the observer.

(1) That doesn't make any sense.
(2) That would violate conservation of energy and momentum, as any energy or momentum that the particle had would disappear as well.
(3) How would that even be testable?

[talanum1 (OP)]

You can ask the observer if he/she has absorbed a particle. If you compute using a record from the obsever's mind it need not violate energy and momentum.

[Bored chemist]

You can ask the observer if he/she has absorbed a particle.

You can ask. But they can't really answer so that's just silly.

[Bored chemist]

This may help.

I doubt it.

The problem becomes trying to define time potential,

Then don't bother.
It doesn't add anything.

It is not exactly a photon of energy.

It is not remotely like a photon.

In the case of fissionable materials, like uranium, critical geometry, which is a function of mass and distance/volume, will be used to alter the rate of radioactive decay of the fuel rods.

Not really.

And I'm just going to restate my invitation to the mods to consider starting a thread for "PP's rambling thread hijacks".

[talanum1 (OP)]

 The L⁰ has no momentum so that leaves only energy to be read off the observer's mind. The L⁰ will always have the same energy, so the other two particles can have definite energies.

[Bored chemist]

The L⁰ has no momentum so that leaves only energy to be read off the observer's mind. The L⁰ will always have the same energy, so the other two particles can have definite energies.

Do you actually think this might be science?

[Kryptid]

You can ask the observer if he/she has absorbed a particle. If you compute using a record from the obsever's mind it need not violate energy and momentum.

How is the observer supposed to know that they absorbed a particle?

The L⁰ has no momentum so that leaves only energy to be read off the observer's mind. The L⁰ will always have the same energy, so the other two particles can have definite energies.

Energy and momentum are closely  related concepts. Even photons, which have no rest mass, have a momentum associated with their kinetic energy. So I don't think your idea is realistic.

[talanum1 (OP)]

How is the observer supposed to know that they absorbed a particle?

He/she will feel it.

Energy and momentum are closely  related concepts. Even photons, which have no rest mass, have a momentum associated with their kinetic energy. So I don't think your idea is realistic.

There must be energy associated to particle properties other than mass and velocity (even though very little).

[Origin]

He/she will feel it.

What does it feel like?

Is it time to move this to "that can't be true", or does it have to descend even deeper into pseudoscience (if that is possible)?

[talanum1 (OP)]

What does it feel like?

It feels like a little spirit entered your mind at the front, right side.

[Origin]

It feels like a little spirit entered your mind at the front, right side.

I don't know what a spirit entering my mind feels like, so that doesn't help.  Why the front right side do you think.  Are you feeling ok?  This is a really strange thing to believe.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Why the front right side do you think.  Are you feeling ok?

I observed a pi-minus decay (or what I think was one) and felt it. Yes I'm feeling ok.

[Kryptid]

He/she will feel it.

It feels like a little spirit entered your mind at the front, right side.

You have got to be kidding me. Do you have even the slightest bit of evidence for such a thing?

I observed a pi-minus decay (or what I think was one) and felt it. Yes I'm feeling ok.

How did you observe something microscopic?

There must be energy associated to particle properties other than mass and velocity (even though very little).

Evidence needed.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Do you have even the slightest bit of evidence for such a thing?

Just my own feeling. Observe a pi-minus decay and feel it for yourself.

How did you observe something microscopic?

I didn't see it, but I felt it.

Evidence needed.

There are videos saying that space has a zero point energy.

[Bored chemist]

Observe a pi-minus decay

In reality , we can't.

[Origin]

I observed a pi-minus decay (or what I think was one) and felt it. Yes I'm feeling ok.

I didn't see it, but I felt it.

So let me get this straight. 
You felt something in the right front part of your head, so you assumed it was an unknown particle from a pi-minus decay entering your mind?
Is that what you are saying??