0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You're the one saying you're going to war if your theory isn't accepted.
Quote from: Kryptid on 12/10/2022 04:45:41You're the one saying you're going to war if your theory isn't accepted.Absolutely. It will start with a flurry of flyers raining down on universities with the message of Kartazion and his theory written on it.
Vandalism? With flyers? I am neither a vandal nor a villain. I assure you. But the fight I'm going to lead will be tough for my opponents.
Littering is vandalism.
The constitution of the physical laws as well as the result of this chaos of the universe until us suggests that it was premeditated.
Quote from: JLindgaard on 12/10/2022 20:37:05 You missed the point I was making. It shows that you've never studied Boltzmann's Ideal Gas Law or other sciencethat applies to earth science, geosciences or atmospheric chemistry. 17/300,000 = 0.000056667Multiply that by 700 and you get 0.0396 w/m^2 for each km. If the ground is radiating heat, the same math applies.And divide 0.0396 by 1,000 and you get 0.000039667 w/m^3. And that's if you accept that solar radiation emitted by the Sun or refracted radiation from the ground travels at the speed of light. Isn't math and science fun?Please open your own topic. Thanks.
You missed the point I was making. It shows that you've never studied Boltzmann's Ideal Gas Law or other sciencethat applies to earth science, geosciences or atmospheric chemistry. 17/300,000 = 0.000056667Multiply that by 700 and you get 0.0396 w/m^2 for each km. If the ground is radiating heat, the same math applies.And divide 0.0396 by 1,000 and you get 0.000039667 w/m^3. And that's if you accept that solar radiation emitted by the Sun or refracted radiation from the ground travels at the speed of light. Isn't math and science fun?
the theory that I expose poses a problem for the guardians that you are
And people are offended by saying perpetual motion is actually conservation of momentum?
I don't see why it would.
Besides, you have always refuted the idea of a creator to be able to previgilate the hazzard.
I know English isn't your first language, so I have to admit I don't know what you mean by that sentence.
Besides, you have always refuted the idea of a creator to be able to previgilate the chance.
Can you quote me on where I have refuted what you claim I have?
? The sentence is well written.
Here. https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=84146.20
Special advantage given to chance rather than our God.
Yep.