The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 23   Go Down

Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)

  • 452 Replies
  • 61815 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #160 on: 14/10/2022 11:28:32 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 08:56:35
Because the theorem has not been defeated yet, doesn't mean it can't be
Yes it does.
once again you are doing this
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/10/2022 23:11:05
You are , in effect, saying "But what if 2 and 2 is not 4?".
That's not science, is it?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #161 on: 14/10/2022 12:25:55 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 11:28:32
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 08:56:35
Because the theorem has not been defeated yet, doesn't mean it can't be
Yes it does.
once again you are doing this
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/10/2022 23:11:05
You are , in effect, saying "But what if 2 and 2 is not 4?".
That's not science, is it?
use the red and blue lines to stay of zero. it allows a full return. it never has to touch zero.
0.5 to 0.706
2.5 to 3.535

0.706-0.5=0.206
3.535-2.5=1.035
1.035*0.206=0.21321
1.035/0.206=5.0242718446601941747572815533981 (showing our ghost particle interaction access above 5)

* perpetual pathways. .jpg (298.65 kB, 1287x1302 - viewed 81 times.)
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #162 on: 14/10/2022 17:15:49 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 12:25:55
use the red and blue lines to stay of zero. it allows a full return. it never has to touch zero.
Does not even parse.
It's not English.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #163 on: 14/10/2022 17:29:52 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 17:15:49
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 12:25:55
use the red and blue lines to stay of zero. it allows a full return. it never has to touch zero.
Does not even parse.
It's not English.
so a system that never touches zero by using 0.5 to 2.5 doesn't parch? or maybe you just don't know what the **** i'm talking about. bro. i've asked, repeatedly for you to drop it.

i even showed that 2n vs 2n+1 includes a modified zero system to allow looping. it shows growth in positive spectrum instead of negative.
spectrum=.
used to classify something, or suggest that it can be classified, in terms of its position on a scale between two extreme or opposite points.
2n+1 is the spectrum scale as it can show positive to negative or all positive, while accounting for zero.
meaning what appears to be negative to positive can be all positive spectrum, naturally.
time itself is known to be birectional, with the torus being its considered shape. its only considered that way when you leave out the multiverse, megaverse, gigaverse and tetraverse, which coincidently copies the electron shell diagram in layers.
you know what, why speak when i'm not getting heard. i'll shut the **** up. if anyone needs my input, blame bored chemist and his incessant pushes for me to. **** off bored chemist. for real.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #164 on: 14/10/2022 17:38:37 »
follow the purple and green. and shut the **** up. theorem broken. because what you describe as undefeatable just requires time. oh wait. gotta give you time to come up with some other reason.

two pathways, for two masses.

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 065354.jpg (419.48 kB, 1492x1035 - viewed 88 times.)
« Last Edit: 14/10/2022 17:47:16 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #165 on: 14/10/2022 17:43:45 »
the original, so you can see the paths are there.

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 114313.jpg (196.28 kB, 1171x894 - viewed 89 times.)
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #166 on: 14/10/2022 17:48:07 »
do you want to show your quality of humanity anymore by further not hearing me say please leave me alone?
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #167 on: 14/10/2022 17:49:21 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 17:15:49
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 12:25:55
use the red and blue lines to stay of zero. it allows a full return. it never has to touch zero.
Does not even parse.
It's not English.
You should master english before you master physics bro. its not that hard of a language. because i spoke clearly. you just chose to not try and hear me. you already made up in your mind, that i'm not worth hearing. so neither are you.
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #168 on: 14/10/2022 17:51:17 »
It's true that you are using English words, but the way you are using them is admittedly hard to understand.
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #169 on: 14/10/2022 17:55:24 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 14/10/2022 17:51:17
It's true that you are using English words, but the way you are using them is admittedly hard to understand.
autism. but you guys act as if i'm not trying. so i'm done trying. **** it.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #170 on: 14/10/2022 17:56:43 »
allows for two mass conversions from a single energy source being divided.
green and purple (green follows purple for a shot time, a shared area, hiding green) are both routes it can follow. two masses, one energy. meaning, we would have to figure out how the expansion works. but yet, its not allowed because of a theorem that "no one can disprove". unless we thought about it in flawed technique, and it was never actually proven. we just considered it proven. this allows us to circumnavigate zero on two paths. energy=passage of time.

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 114313.jpg (196.28 kB, 1171x894 - viewed 75 times.)

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 065354.jpg (419.48 kB, 1492x1035 - viewed 88 times.)
« Last Edit: 14/10/2022 18:01:22 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #171 on: 14/10/2022 18:02:13 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 17:49:21
because i spoke clearly
You didn't.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #172 on: 14/10/2022 18:02:47 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 17:55:24
autism.
Do you think that's rare around here?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #173 on: 14/10/2022 18:06:22 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 18:02:47
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 17:55:24
autism.
Do you think that's rare around here?
do you think your entitled to speak to me?

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 065354.jpg (209.38 kB, 1187x1096 - viewed 96 times.)
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #174 on: 14/10/2022 18:06:55 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 18:02:13
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 17:49:21
because i spoke clearly
You didn't.
need me to dumb it down to neanderthal for you?
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #175 on: 14/10/2022 18:07:41 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 18:02:47
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 17:55:24
autism.
Do you think that's rare around here?
I'm sorry if you struggle to be understood as well. but you're being a total douchebag.
You need to leave me alone. please.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #176 on: 14/10/2022 18:11:32 »
mass=inertia reserve.
inertia=a property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force.
reserve=refrain from using or disposing of (something); retain for future use.

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 065354.jpg (209.38 kB, 1187x1096 - viewed 85 times.)
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #177 on: 14/10/2022 18:16:11 »
with mass as a force reserve, energy itself is a singularity. it allows a duality construct, before a trinary state assumes both previous systems. the trinary state mirrors the previous two.
electron adds a -1 movement.
proton adds a +2 movement
neutron stacks a +1 with -2 movement.
it shows neutrality when paired. a neutron alone shows an overall -1 charge, like the electron, when considered on its own.
« Last Edit: 14/10/2022 18:22:48 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #178 on: 14/10/2022 18:36:47 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 18:06:22
do you think your entitled to speak to me?
Yes. It's part of the point of a forum.
Did you not realise that?

Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 18:07:41
but you're being a total douchebag.
You need to leave me alone. please.
It's my understanding that it does not help deluded individuals if you encourage them to believe their delusions.

I believe that pointing out that you are posting word salad is better for you, as well as better for the forum.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #179 on: 14/10/2022 18:44:24 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 18:36:47
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 18:06:22
do you think your entitled to speak to me?
Yes. It's part of the point of a forum.
Did you not realise that?

Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 18:07:41
but you're being a total douchebag.
You need to leave me alone. please.
It's my understanding that it does not help deluded individuals if you encourage them to believe their delusions.

I believe that pointing out that you are posting word salad is better for you, as well as better for the forum.
I believe that you are being an ignoramus. To each their own. I'll forgo replying for now on.

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 114313.jpg (196.28 kB, 1171x894 - viewed 90 times.)

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 065354.jpg (209.38 kB, 1187x1096 - viewed 87 times.)

* 3 6 9 of energy and mass.png (51.54 kB, 1615x1273 - viewed 77 times.)
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 23   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: delusion  / pseudoscience 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.267 seconds with 65 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.