[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I see you quoted Nassim Haramein . He's a an extraordinarily deluded crank or crackpot, whichever is the best description. Referring to such dubious sources sinks your argument on the spot.

elitism. lol

It really isn't elitism to point out that a crank is a crank.

unless he's not a crank. and his seeing the power behind flower of life imagery. i guess anyone who goes against what you say is a crank. does that make you the authority. no. its your opinion. zero scientific relevance.

if he's a crank, disprove any of his work. or show where it has.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I see you quoted Nassim Haramein . He's a an extraordinarily deluded crank or crackpot, whichever is the best description. Referring to such dubious sources sinks your argument on the spot.

elitism. lol

It really isn't elitism to point out that a crank is a crank.

unless he's not a crank. and his seeing the power behind flower of life imagery. i guess anyone who goes against what you say is a crank. does that make you the authority. no. its your opinion. zero scientific relevance.

if he's a crank, disprove any of his work. or show where it has.

you stated it, now prove it.
turn the table a little bit. lol.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I see you quoted Nassim Haramein . He's a an extraordinarily deluded crank or crackpot, whichever is the best description. Referring to such dubious sources sinks your argument on the spot.

elitism. lol

It really isn't elitism to point out that a crank is a crank.

unless he's not a crank. and his seeing the power behind flower of life imagery. i guess anyone who goes against what you say is a crank. does that make you the authority. no. its your opinion. zero scientific relevance.

if he's a crank, disprove any of his work. or show where it has.

you stated it, now prove it.
turn the table a little bit. lol.

you asked and i tried my best to offer evidence. but like i said, you can't make a person think. you can't force them to reconsider what they think is true. you can only ask them to.
that's what i did. but, i'm a liar.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Please, give your best description of time.
lets start with what would be included or not included.
my description calls for tesseract interactions. does yours?

notice i use 6 hexagons.
can 5 pentagons create a tesseract?
notice we can half it, with symmetry.
notice we can insert 2n+1 in our center squares.
but yet, we only have two actual squares. (purple). the blue square is forward. not on the same 2d plane.

[Bored chemist]

so they allowed religious pressure to sway things.

What religion do you mean?
Are you trying to say that science is a religion?
Are you really saying that- on a science site?

[Origin]

that's what i did. but, i'm a liar.

I don't think anyone called you a liar.  I think that people have pointed out that you are wrong on science or just writing nonsense.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

you can't find an explanation for cosmologically seemingly free energy.

If you mean the big bang, look through the site carefully and you will find the bit where I pointed out that the big bang is the one time when Noether's theorem doesn't prevent an increase in energy.
(Because the symmetry is broken; there is no "before" the BB.)

It's not that I refuse to think this stuff through.
It's that I already did and I know it's a crock.


And you still need to stop playing at numerology on a science page: it's just silly.

example 1, but wait it gets better.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

that's what i did. but, i'm a liar.

I don't think anyone called you a liar.  I think that people have pointed out that you are wrong on science or just writing nonsense.

I guess google and sweden lies!

No.
The person who tries to say that a Swedish research institute said "if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3."
is lying.
Why do you do it?

see who started using insulting language

Turning up on a science page and talking about perpetual motion is an insult to science.
Yet you keep doing it.

**** you guys. right here. no one called me a liar eh?

[Bored chemist]

that's what i did. but, i'm a liar.

I don't think anyone called you a liar.  I think that people have pointed out that you are wrong on science or just writing nonsense.

I guess google and sweden lies!

No.
The person who tries to say that a Swedish research institute said "if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3."
is lying.
Why do you do it?

see who started using insulting language

Turning up on a science page and talking about perpetual motion is an insult to science.
Yet you keep doing it.

**** you guys. right here. no one called me a liar eh?

Only because you lied...

[Bored chemist]

if he's a crank, disprove any of his work. or show where it has.

Sure
https://web.archive.org/web/20190119191115/https://azureworld.blogspot.com/2010/02/nassim-haramein-fraud-or-sage.html
and the links there.
Did you imagine that was going to be difficult?

[Bored chemist]

that is my direct quote. not swedens

Yes.
And I described it as word salad and you falsely attributed it to "Sweden".

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

imagine chaos logistics map being applied to time. that is what happens when we are not among the few that exit the time loop. disintegration into energy.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm not talking his physics. his work on golden ratios. all of us are wrong in some ways. none of us see the big picture in entirety.
not even me. thats why i'm here. seeking help. to see if time being perpetual is a second perpetual system that would show we have been looped, because nature duped us.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

that is my direct quote. not swedens

Yes.
And I described it as word salad and you falsely attributed it to "Sweden".

no. i said they made sound with artificial atoms. and if they did truly have an artificial atom....
I'm not sure their artificial atom is close enough.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm not talking his physics. his work on golden ratios. all of us are wrong in some ways. none of us see the big picture in entirety.
not even me. thats why i'm here. seeking help. to see if time being perpetual is a second perpetual system that would show we have been looped, because nature duped us.

he's drawn to flower of life like i am. why? its dual circle grids. all space is curved. odds and evens and the stability of helium sets the power of dual systems.

a two is involved in both colaltz and chaos theory. population capacity tests use 0.5n.
and when a mathematician works on infinity, he uses two.
makes a lot more sense if electron=1, proton=2 where neutron=3.
instead of electron=1, proton=2, neutron=2 (never has a charge)

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

for the record, i highly doubt his "resonance jewelry" actually has an effect.
I know i'm not gonna waste the money to test it.

[Kryptid]

I'm a Christian and I would not want a perpetual motion machine (should one actually be possible) to be destroyed, so I don't know why you would say such a thing.

Look, this thread is still getting personal and using insults. I've showed you how to block people if they are bothering you. I suggest you use it if you can't just ignore them. If this keeps up, I'll probably lock the thread. If I do have to lock the thread, you won't be allowed to open a new thread about this same topic. Keep that in mind when you make replies in the future.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm a Christian and I would not want a perpetual motion machine (should one actually be possible) to be destroyed, so I don't know why you would say such a thing.

Look, this thread is still getting personal and using insults. I've showed you how to block people if they are bothering you. I suggest you use it if you can't just ignore them. If this keeps up, I'll probably lock the thread. If I do have to lock the thread, you won't be allowed to open a new thread about this same topic. Keep that in mind when you make replies in the future.

even if it destroys your religion? would all agree?
that would include those who have power, like the papal states.
who fight wars over beliefs. slaughter many just in the name of what they have faith in existing.
I'm glad you're one of the better ones. who care more of the greatness it would reward.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

so bored chemist can harass me (it tells me that he commented, just hides it from view) and lock up my thread, and i'm not aloud to bring it back up?
sweet. go ahead bored. keeping bringing that energy. you're close to what you seem to want.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

that is my direct quote. not swedens

Yes.
And I described it as word salad and you falsely attributed it to "Sweden".

no. i forgot to end a quotation. bro. look at the way you have acted. bullish and brash. now i'm doing my best to be nice here, to not get my thread locked. if you're allowed mistakes, so am i. i even unblocked you, to welcome you back. but yet, no one called me a liar.

forgiveness is such a great thing to give. can i be forgiven for forgetting to end a copy paste quote?
can we earnestly, be friends through our disagreements, and help each other grow and think more deeply?