[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Remember what I said about Noether's theorem?

describe time please. if atoms are allowed perpetual systems, describe time.
when does it stop?
and don't quote scripture.
what if time is a 2nd perpetual system. and nature used Neother's theorem to loop time on us.
it would explain Mandella effect. as physics.
improper data processing. mixing of existences to reform a crashed universe. no need for big bang.
more like, smaller bangs. on an overall loop.
where does big bang get its incoming energy? tesseracts from the multiverse maybe?

maybe we were wrong, but so close to right we tricked the world into believing it, over time?

[Kryptid]

Depends on what you mean by "perpetual motion". Certain kinds of perpetual motion are allowed so long as they don't violate conservation of energy. A particle moving through a vacuum can keep going and that's fine because it doesn't violate conservation of energy. A machine that can literally create new energy, on the other hand, is not allowed without breaking time symmetry. Time being the dimension that separates one event from another.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Depends on what you mean by "perpetual motion". Certain kinds of perpetual motion are allowed so long as they don't violate conservation of energy. A particle moving through a vacuum can keep going and that's fine because it doesn't violate conservation of energy. A machine that can literally create new energy, on the other hand, is not allowed without breaking time symmetry. Time being the dimension that separates one event from another.

a natural machine that uses pressure to create spin. which can then be harnessed to create free energy. using a faraday cage type design.
we aren't taking energy off the system. just using the motion to create will to move in electrons.
its a 10th additional layer, with no magnets. just wires.
we would be borrowing small reserves of force, that the machine would wind back up to replace. the actual collection of energy, is aloud because we are outside the system. think of it as collecting the sound we know atoms create. we harness what it gives off. and i can't build it on my own. or even test if its enough to power anything, or worth the effort. not on my own. I could help ya'll. if ya'll took it seriously enough to see.

[Kryptid]

You can't create energy that way.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

You can't create energy that way.

umm, separate the faraday cage into a cell system. each cell is activated by one magnet at a time. We'd get half of the cells activating. keep in mind, 512+256=768 is a lot of magnets. each would provide a little, that we would have to condense. we'd have to set a computer to block generation for (north magnets i think). if it moves, we can harness it. its getting the precision to move. wait. i'm not for building the machines. just understanding them. what am i doing. you know what. its just better to leave you guys thinking its not possible. its too dangerous. even if climate change also seems to show time slowing. sorry for bothering ya'll.

total system not universe. our local system stays pretty relative, by what we see.

[paul cotter]

Kryptid, bipolar,imho.

[Kryptid]

You still won't get net energy.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Kryptid, bipolar,imho.

bipolar schizophrenic.
dissociative identity disorder.
autism.
no opinions needed.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

You still won't get net energy.

we can try. or you can make statements.
which is science?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Kryptid, bipolar,imho.

bipolar schizophrenic.
dissociative identity disorder.
autism.
no opinions needed.

by the way, try reading. i done stated this once.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

if you want to be taken seriously, take me as seriously as you expect to be taken. you more than likely struggle as well. life handed me more struggles.
do you always feel up to doing what you need to do? no, depression.
we each struggle. but that doesn't mean we can't get that struggle under control and become a functioning member of society. so why don't you join us, instead of making statements, try science.
the difference between science and insanity. science you are supposed to change parameters before you attempt to try again.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

You still won't get net energy.

proof? besides the theorem that is invalidated if time is perpetual?

i keep asking for things. you guys have provided a lot of insinuated insults. and only one thing to say i'm wrong, but can't explain time over all to show that your theorem truly holds.
yet, also, i get told to watch what i say. not a thing has been said once i showed i have been called a liar. that was uncalled for. by the way kryptid, didn't you say perpetual systems are allowed in atoms? he called you a liar too.
I'm not saying to be mad at him. just don't be a hypocrite saying to watch me in my inbox and while bored goes around saying whatever with nothing said about it by ya'll in public space.

oh wait. i was told i wasn't called a liar. dang.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

that's what i did. but, i'm a liar.

I don't think anyone called you a liar.  I think that people have pointed out that you are wrong on science or just writing nonsense.

I guess google and sweden lies!

No.
The person who tries to say that a Swedish research institute said "if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3."
is lying.
Why do you do it?

see who started using insulting language

Turning up on a science page and talking about perpetual motion is an insult to science.
Yet you keep doing it.

**** you guys. right here. no one called me a liar eh?

Only because you lied...

but no one called me a liar.
you guys make clear statements of what is possible or not. not very scientific.
but i'm a liar. lol.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm not even aloud to ask for people to not comment, which still shows and emails when blocked, but yet people can call me a liar without a word said, or even better, i get told "i doubt anyone called you a liar". not a public thing said after i show it. thats why i don't care if you guys learn it from me. read it from a textbook later.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

maybe read back comments to see what has been said. instead of rehashing what i've done admitted to, as a slap to my face.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

see. now i gotta deal with this whole mood you guys have put me in. thank you.
for the slaps, the lairs, the word salad. while you guys are adamant that you know.
and science is all about the journey of discovery.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

like unlocking the true meaning of a undeciphered journal to find the corrected view on science. lmao

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

holy crap. does that 2nd page side relate to collatz? the green stars moving. i think its a collatz cypher.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

that is oddly reminiscent of collatz.
2 (marked 2)
2 no mark
4 (marked 3)
3
2 (marked 2)

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

it links the only one, to another, @ the beginning of the green stars. if 1 remains.

the other green star links to 2!

weird...