[guest39538]

Something of nothing that is correct.

I don't understand this sentence.

It shows a BH in an infinite space,

Again, what is that supposed to prove?

It proves that a BH can be a point  but also be huge at the same time.

[Kryptid]

It proves that a BH can be a point  but also be huge at the same time.

That is true in a sense. The singularity at the center is a point but the event horizon has a finite diameter. I don't know what your R3 diagram has to do with that, though.

[Bored chemist]

you are insane if you think space affects the caesium clock.

Where did you think anyone said it did?

[guest39538]

you are insane if you think space affects the caesium clock.

Where did you think anyone said it did?

They don' t in those exact words, they do when they say space-time affects the Caesium,

[guest39538]

ou would if the Universe was a hypersphere (take note that I said if. We don't know what its true shape is). It's for the same reason that you can fly at a constant l

Science has a big problem with looking out, they never seem to see within from outside.

[Bored chemist]

they do when they say space-time affects the Caesium,

Where?

[Kryptid]

Science has a big problem with looking out, they never seem to see within from outside.

I don't know what that means.

[guest39538]

Science has a big problem with looking out, they never seem to see within from outside.

I don't know what that means.

It means science looks out into space and never puts themselves in the perspective of looking back from outer space, I am  a ''trillion'' light years in the non-observable universe looking back at our observable Universe.   

I zoomed out some more for you .


kryt.jpg (12.52 kB . 740x464 - viewed 3220 times)

[guest39538]

they do when they say space-time affects the Caesium,

Where?

Oh come on, you know what I am getting it, you say time affects the Caesium ,

[guest39538]

kryt upgraded version.jpg (16.93 kB . 740x464 - viewed 3088 times)

Each dot is an observable Universe, or a BH if you like.

[guest39538]

My objective conceptual observable universe is a lot bigger than your subjective observable universe.

[Bored chemist]

My objective conceptual observable universe is a lot bigger than your subjective observable universe.

Your scribblings are not objective- you are the only one who sees them which makes then very subjective.

they do when they say space-time affects the Caesium,

Where?

Oh come on, you know what I am getting it, you say time affects the Caesium ,

Time affects everything.
So what?
Pleas answer the question.

[guest39538]

My objective conceptual observable universe is a lot bigger than your subjective observable universe.

Your scribblings are not objective- you are the only one who sees them which makes then very subjective

they do when they say space-time affects the Caesium,

Where?

Oh come on, you know what I am getting it, you say time affects the Caesium ,

Time affects everything.
So what?
Pleas answer the question.

Time affects everything, you are so funny and deluded for sure.    Time can not affect anything, time is objectively not a thing of distinct and  independent existence, try again.

added- Please provide evidence of the independent and distinct existence of this subjective version of time you keep mentioning  .   .What do you call it ? space-time. 

What science tries to do is use a sort of Legalese, they have invented their own language, this is to try and make them look smart.

I understand now, ''you'' are using your ''jurisdiction'' to create this ''legalese'' fake subjective reality.  Quite clever but not that clever.

 

[Kryptid]

It means science looks out into space and never puts themselves in the perspective of looking back from outer space, I am  a ''trillion'' light years in the non-observable universe looking back at our observable Universe.   

I zoomed out some more for you .


kryt.jpg (12.52 kB . 740x464 - viewed 3220 times)

This is nothing new, honestly.  Max Tegmark called such a thing the "level I multiverse": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse#Max_Tegmark's_four_levels

[guest39538]

It means science looks out into space and never puts themselves in the perspective of looking back from outer space, I am  a ''trillion'' light years in the non-observable universe looking back at our observable Universe.   

I zoomed out some more for you .


kryt.jpg (12.52 kB . 740x464 - viewed 3220 times)

This is nothing new, honestly.  Max Tegmark called such a thing the "level I multiverse": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse#Max_Tegmark's_four_levels

Then why did you not understand beyond the event Horizon of a BH , that there is no acting forces?

Thanks for the link, I had not come across that one before.

[Kryptid]

Then why did you not understand beyond the event Horizon of a BH , that there is no acting forces?

Because there are. Again, Cynus X-1 and V404 Cygni.

[guest39538]

Then why did you not understand beyond the event Horizon of a BH , that there is no acting forces?

Because there are. Again, Cynus X-1 and V404 Cygni.

Which are within the boundary of the BH.   BH's within a BH

[Bored chemist]

What science tries to do is use a sort of Legalese, they have invented their own language, this is to try and make them look smart.

I understand now, ''you'' are using your ''jurisdiction'' to create this ''legalese'' fake subjective reality

Nonsense.

[guest39538]

What science tries to do is use a sort of Legalese, they have invented their own language, this is to try and make them look smart.

I understand now, ''you'' are using your ''jurisdiction'' to create this ''legalese'' fake subjective reality

Nonsense.

Then why do you try to claim jurisdiction in this thread by keep saying my interpretation is nonsense?

[Bored chemist]

It's not even meaningful to say I'm trying to claim jurisdiction.
I'm saying your posts are nonsense because they are.