0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Do you have evidence from way out in space?

Since we are within a strong gravitational field, Einstein's relativity applies.

My own discussions4- Every points of path OB are scanned by the photon itself along the time T_{1} – T_{0}. However, since the experimenter in the K ’system is unaware of his own motion, he is mistaken to determine this distance as AB at the time of T_{1}. When the detection is incorrect, it is natural that the analysis and the result will be also incorrect. While the photon travels to + x direction and if its source or K' system goes to the direction –x (which is naturally possible), the photon only scans every points of the way OB. We cannot claim that the photon travelled the way DO or DB. (figure 2). If we insist for SR, we findt'(opposite direction) > t'(same direction)that if we simultaneously consider both option, the clock of K' system cannot indicate these different times.K'.........................K......................................................................................PıL..........................L.....................................................................................*D...........................O.....................................................................................BFigure 2. If the source goes to the direction – x5- SR restricts the thought by isolating the light / photon with its source and analysing their motions only with the method of relativity. If we can isolate a single photon in an experiment on the Earth and if we can detect T_{0} and T_{1} moments precisely (L: distance between light source and photon detector): (T_{1} - T_{0}). c - L = V_{U}. (T_{1} - T_{0}) (c)We may use this equation (c). If the motion of the world is parallel to the photon and in the same direction, the photon’s arrival point will be translated a little due to the V_{U} speed of the world according to the LCS and the travelled length by the photon will be different than L.

Yet a single photon is independent of Einstein's rules. It has no gravitational field.

K'.........................K......................................................................................PıL..........................L.....................................................................................*D...........................O.....................................................................................BFigure 2. If the source goes to the direction – x

I'm still waiting for you to tell me what the flaws in our experiments are. You can't tell us that they are flawed and then not tell us how they are flawed. If your claims aren't testable, then they aren't science.

The weakest point of special relativity is Einstein developed the theory with three equations, one each for mass, distance and time. However, the lion's share of practical applications only use two equations; distance and time. This creates a problem.

If we examine the figure 2 (Please look at attachment), we can clearly comprehend the flaw of SR. Because, when the source goes to opposite direction of the photon, the distance of DO does not be included of the photon's way. The photon never scans the way DO. Photon passes over every points of OB way after emitting. So, "exact/genuine relativity" cannot be mentioned. Please remember the relationship of car and road.

SR imposes an imperative that the source always follows the photon.

Please share those experiments' articles and links. I 'll interpret them.

and that are picked up by our gravitational field.

Yet they do not prove that the universe works according to Einstein.

Unless we could go to outer space and conduct tests there, there is no evidence that what Einstein says is true.

GG: Space as I see it is composed of a blend of the gravitational field and the electromagnetic fields. Without the fields nothing can pass through space.

GG: I do not see space as an independent entity apart from the fields. If you can get rid of the fields then you could erase the universe. The Earths field is connected to all the other fields but if you move very far apart from a minimum amount of gravitational field, a spaceship would self-destruct into nothingness. The only thing left would be light speed Cs photonic dot-waves. That is what we would find way out in space.

Quote from: xersanozgen on 12/03/2020 08:47:21If we examine the figure 2 (Please look at attachment), we can clearly comprehend the flaw of SR. Because, when the source goes to opposite direction of the photon, the distance of DO does not be included of the photon's way. The photon never scans the way DO. Photon passes over every points of OB way after emitting. So, "exact/genuine relativity" cannot be mentioned. Please remember the relationship of car and road.1- And, again, this isn't something that special relativity has a problem with...Quote from: xersanozgen on 12/03/2020 12:37:20SR imposes an imperative that the source always follows the photon. 2- No it doesn't. The source can move however it likes. It's just that length contraction and time dilation will always occur in the source's reference frame such that the velocity of the emitted photon is always measured as c by the source.Quote from: xersanozgen on 12/03/2020 08:47:21Please share those experiments' articles and links. I 'll interpret them.3- Here's one: http://www.exphy.uni-duesseldorf.de/Publikationen/2009/Eisele%20et%20al%20Laboratory%20Test%20of%20the%20Isotropy%20of%20Light%20Propagation%20at%20the%2010-17%20Level%202009.pdf

If you agree that anyone in any reference frame must measure light to travel at c regardless of their movement, then what is the problem? That's exactly what special relativity predicts.

I say that the value c is relative value according to only outer space.

Quote from: xersanozgen on 14/03/2020 08:38:08I say that the value c is relative value according to only outer space.Outer space isn't a reference frame.

SR does not allow cosmological analyses because of non-simultaneity of data.

Quote from: xersanozgen on 14/03/2020 18:31:09SR does not allow cosmological analyses because of non-simultaneity of data.Non-simultaneity is a direct consequence of an invariant speed of light. You have agreed that light speed is invariant. As such, non-simultaneity must be a feature of your model as well.