How accurate is GPS for measuring speed?
Hi Dr. Smith
Would you be so kind to clarify this relating to GPS speed monitor on next week's show with Redi?
My thoughts are as follows, but they are ever so slightly incoherent.
In South Africa a good signal will allow a WAAS enabled GPS to be around 3m accurate on average, with a variation up to 15m for the horizontal plane this is usually trebled in the vertical plane - so 9 to 45m.
Most GPS, outdoors type GARMINS - "take a point" every second - it may be saved as a track or waypoint or not, so if you use it to monitor your speed at around 120km/h- where you travel roughly 33.3 m/s you can have a horizontal error of up to 30m but mostly the distance measured could vary from -6 to 6m from 33.3 which seems very inaccurate - contrary to the "evidence" on display
So what is the reason for the accuracy, pure averaging?
Or does the error follow a pattern? I.e two points taken directly after each other will err more or less in the same direction and extent. I ask this because there is apparently still some error introduced by governments and this may cause a "pattern following" error, or will the ionospheric and atmospheric and satellite delays for two consecutive measurements be roughly the same?
I'm not even considering the vertical plane, as my trig is non-existent, but you may
BTW car manufacturers err on the side of caution for speedometers but are spot-on for odometers, unless you change your tyre circumference or gearing.
Dave - The two devices are measuring speed in very different ways. The speedometer is measuring the number of times your wheels turn every second or every minute, and if you know the circumference of your wheels you can work out how fast you're going. There can be errors on that because the tires will wear down, that will change the circumference of your wheels. Quite often, I think they build speedometers to possibly slightly under-read which is quite good because that way, you get less speeding tickets. Especially, old fashioned speedometers weren't as accurate as modern ones. They weren't computerised and they just tended to be less sensitive at high speeds to have actually kind of fudged that back into modern computerised speedometers, because people expect it to be less sensitive at high speeds.
The GPS is basically measuring your position repeatedly and measuring how far you move over a certain period of time and then dividing that distance by the time it's averaged over, and then that will give your speed. If you're stationary, the GPS will quite often give you a speed, so the GPS is not at all accurate in giving a speed when you're going very, very slowly because the errors in position can be a few meters. And the accuracy of the speed will depend on how long it's averaging over to get the speed. So if it's averaging for 10 minutes the GPS will be more accurate, if it's averaging over 2 seconds the speedometer will certainly be.