Did the Big Bang create dark matter?

05 July 2016


The galaxy cluster Abell 3827. The distribution of dark matter is shown with blue lines.



If the Universe is comprised of 96% of dark matter/dark energy, do we have concrete proof the big bang actually created dark matter/dark energy?

Could it not be the case dark matter/dark energy already existed, and it was an interaction with an unknown particle and dark matter/dark energy which caused the big bang to occur?

If dark matter/dark energy is so dominant within the Universe, why should be hypothesize the big bang created dark matter/dark energy? We are basing this hypothesis on the 4% of matter we can see.


Chris Smith put this to professor Andrew Norton, astronomer from the Open University...

Andrew - Well, yeah. Dark energy, dark matter - these are names that we give to things that we really have no idea what they are. We see the evidence for it in the way that galaxies rotate, in the way that galaxies move through space. There must be some other matter there that's controlling how things move through the effect of its gravity, but we have no idea what it is. Dark energy on the other hand, it's not anything to do with dark matter. It just happens to have a word in common. But that seems to be some stuff - again, we don't know what it is - that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. Now, the simple answer of where they came from is to say, "Well, if the universe began in a Big Bang about 14 billion years ago, the dark matter - whatever it is - and the dark energy - whatever it is - were created there along with time and space, and everything else." Now, that's an easy answer perhaps but it's not a very satisfactory one. There is another theory. Now, I'm not saying that everybody believes this by any means, but it's an intriguing theory. It's called the ekpyrotic universe theory. I think it's from a Greek word meaning borne out of fire. So, we're familiar with four dimensions. Three dimensions of space - up, down, left, right, backwards, forwards, and one dimension of time. Four dimensions we're familiar with, that's fine. In the ekpyrotic universe theory, the universe has 11 dimensions. Bear with me. Six of these dimensions are curled up too small. We can't see them. Let's forget those, but there's another dimension, a fifth dimension which is a dimension of space that we can't experience. The idea is our universe sits on what's called a brane. This is not a b-r-a-i-n, brain.

Chris - Laura was getting all excited then.

Andrew - Sorry, Laura no. this is a b-r-a-n-e, brane - a four dimensional brane.

Chris - Membrane.

Andrew - Membrane, yeah. We think of two dimensional membranes like the skin of a drum. Well, a four dimensional brane, our universe then in this theory sits on a four dimensional brane. And there's another four dimensional brane separated from us across this invisible fifth dimension, this hidden brane. What we think of as the Big Bang was not a creation of time and space. It was actually a big clap when these two branes last came together. And ever since then the two branes have been stretching apart and the tension between those branes is what we see today as dark energy. Also, the matter on that other brane on the hidden brane that is the dark matter that's influencing our universe. And the idea is that these two branes stretch further and further apart. Eventually, sometime in the future, the two branes will spring together, make another big clap and the whole thing will start all over again.

Chris - Effectively then gravity can propagate between or the influences of gravity can propagate between these brains but other stuff can't. So we see the effects of gravity but not other stuff.

Andrew - Yeah. So the leakage of the gravity from this matter on the other brane maybe is what the dark matter is. Now I say, ekpyrotic universe theory, not everyone believes it by any means but I think it's a good fun theory.

Chris - I've learned a new word this evening already - ekpyrotic universe theory. David, does that assuage your hunger?

Dave - Well, I'm just wondering if this new theory, is this based on string theory?

Andrew - It is very closely linked to string theory. You're absolutely right, yeah. As you probably know the idea of string theory is again, tied up with these multidimensional objects, these branes. So it's an attempt in a way to link the cosmology to the string theory. Who knows? It could be right.


By math in an article published in the contoversal "Journal of Cosmology" I interpreted the Big Bang as a phase transition of Dark Energy into matter. The calculus readily suggests that first the Dark Matter was created but only later the Dark matter was accompanied by visible matter, see "On the Possibility of Describing Events in Cosmology at the Scale of Matter Average Density" on Research Gate,

You need to show your calculations to demonstrate your point if you want people to take them seriously. What is the reference to the published work?

Add a comment