At what height above Earth is zero-gravity?

At what altitude above the Earth is zero gravity experienced?
07 March 2017


Astronaut spacewalking above Earth



At what height does zero gravity take effect? Would this vary from different parts of the Earth, and if so, why would this be the case?


Chris Smith put this astronomical question to the Open University's David Rothery...

David - I think there might be a misconception here that, as you get further and further away from the Earth, you’re feeling less of a gravitational pull and at some point you stop feeling the pull of the Earth’s gravity. That’s not what happens!

If you double your distance from the centre of the Earth, the gravity would decrease to a quarter of what it is at the surface, but that’s not zero G.

Zero G in space is because you’re in a space capsule accelerating under gravity, orbiting the Earth, or going from one body to another and you’re not accelerating [relative to the spacecraft]: the person within the spaceship is accelerating at the same rate as the vessel. So it’s like the lift dropping down the lift shaft. So zero G is not distance away from the Earth.

Chris - So people who are on the International Space Station, the reason that they are in orbit around the Earth is because gravity is hanging onto them and keeping them in orbit? But they’re just free-falling around the Earth all the time so that they’re weightless, but that’s not the same as zero G?

David - Correct. They’re in freefall. They’re still experiencing the Earth’s gravity but so is the spaceship that they’re in. So, between them and the space ship, there’s no acceleration.

Chris - Let’s take it to it’s logical conclusion; the reason that Pluto is 6 billion kilometres from where we are here on Earth and it’s still orbiting the Sun is because the Sun’s gravity is hanging onto Pluto, even though it’s that far away. And gravity does get weaker with distance, but there’s still enough to hold onto Pluto and things beyond it.

David - Absolutely!


Presuming the Earth is in an optimal orbit relative to it's mass and composition, as science and ToR tell us, and relative to gravity, or the gravitational pull of the sun at this distance away.... Why is Venus, similar in size and composition, pulled into the sun? Isn't this a necessary result of gravitational theory? As well, obviously, Mercury, how would it achieve a balance at a distance where the gravitational force is much stronger than 1au?? It's also further away from the influence of the giants as well. These two planets smash gravity theory into non-existence. The planets are held in orbit by electricity. They are in vibrational grooves, like a phonograph, but imagine the needle(planet) has to fit in the right groove. Resonance keeps the body in the groove. It can be seen in the plasma arches on the sun. They are identical to magnetic field arches. EM fields propagate in the same manner, we are of course aware of them, but the magnetosphere doesn't just deflect space, it is ewhat bonds us to the sun. Exactly like electrons orbiting a nucleus. Idk how we have not figured this out yet. Peace

It would take a much faster speed to hold an iss or space shuttle in orbit than it would the astro nots in it. The speed to hold a few thousand pounds against the pull of gravity would pin everything of less weight against the opposing wall. Period. It all space disney. “Spacney”. ALL zero gravity non sense is in a descending plane or green schwimming pool. NASA has never been through the firmament with “space” craft. 1986 Challenger had the first satellite on board. Problem was it was a private businessman who funded it to the tune of $20 million. They couldn’t have him figure out he’s been had so they blew it up. All the astro nots survive today. This is a personal family story. The man was my step father...

How high would I have to hit a baseball that it would no longer fall back to earth? And what is the name of the elevation where that occurs? Is that half the earths radius?

#Chris, that makes sense. I read somewhere that the earth's gravity extends to a distance billions of light year away, in fact as old as the earth itself. I now understand why they put it that way. In fact the answer is infinite and not zero according to the inverse square law.

If so, is sun is still or moving in space?

youre saying that because the space station and astronaut are both affected by gravity and have the same acceleration they experience what is called zero gravity? yet while traveling in a car, the car and myself are both affected by gravity and accelerating the same yet no zero gravity....

So this means that where ever you are in space you're falling into "something" Right?, whatever has the largest gravity effect on you....

Gravity obeys an inverse square law; although the intensity falls with distance, it is never zero. That said, local factors opposing gravity may predominate in certain areas. For instance, a supernova will blast the constituents of a star out into space; but those particles will still feel the effects of gravity and eventually will most likely coalesce somewhere else.

However is it correct there is not sufficient atmospheric pressure (i.e zero) to hold a human together. The astronaut is in a vacuum and without a spacesuit would explode (given they were able to survive extreme temp, radiation and zero oxygen)?

Answers given above are.clear satisfactoy and logically.authonticated.thanks

These answers are not clear for the laymen.So does an airplane at 40,000 feet have less gravitational pull on it then when it is at 1000 feet?

So then how does the ISS maintain its position without going further up or dropping down to Earth?

If there were no gravity the ISS would move away from the Earth in a straight line along a tangent to its present orbit. Gravity accelerates the ISS towards the Earth continuously, meaning it's constantly falling towards the planet but "missing", because the Earth curves out of the way. I hope that makes sense?

Agree, the question wasn't answered.

How far from earth do you have to be before the effect of earth's gravity is negligible? (Eg a human would not notice it while doing everyday human things.) Forget spaceships.

Gravity obeys an inverse square law - 1/r^2 - so if you double the distance from the centre of mass, the gravity you feel at the new location is 1/(2^2) = 1/4 of what you felt at the first location. But it's not zero.

The question says "At what height above Earth is zero-gravity?" The answer, as given - is at no height is there zero gravity, because although, at vast distances, 1/r^2 means that the gravitatonal acceleration will be very low, it's not zero.

Pluto is 5 billion kilometres from the Sun, but the reason it orbits the Sun is because, despite that huge distance, it still feels the gravitation acceleration of the Sun and follows an orbital trajectory. The Sun orbits the centre of the Milky Way galaxy, which is thousands of light years away, but there is still a sufficiently strong gravitational influence to keep us on our present path... 

so what your saying is , if you go to the other side of pluto , then you would fall towards the sun....?

The question isn't answered. I would assume the amount of gravitational attraction would depend on the mass of each object. Therefore the smaller the object the less distance it would take to escape the gravitational attraction of the earth. So what would that distance be for the Space Shuttle for example?

The size of different objects would determine how much things are atracted to them but not how much they are atracted to other things. This is why you can drop a feather and a bowling ball on the moon and they hit the surface at the same time. Truly feathers have always had the speed to fall as fast as anything else but unlike larger denser objects such as bowling balls,feathers do not have the mass and therefore the momentum to push through the air which is why they fall so slow on earth.

So whether it be a space shuttle or an astronaut or a peanut, they'll all feel the same amount of gravity at any given distance.

You are correct that a feather and a bowling ball dropped on the moon will hit the ground at the same time. Both are being accelerated by gravity, but the gravitational pull between the bowling ball and the moon is greater than the moon and the feather; but the ball's mass is significantly greater than the feather; so the greater force of attraction is negated by the greater mass; hence both fall at the same rate.

Yes feather and bowling ball fall at the same rate because the acceleration of gravity is the same for both the bowling ball and there is no air resistance going against the feather on the moon. Same case on earth in a vaccum, acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2 hence both objects fall at the same speed because they are on earth with no air resistance or friction. BUT you are correct the bigger the mass the more it is likely to be attracted to another even bigger mass. So the further the ball goes away from earth the gravitational force weakens but not as much as the feather. Which has nothing to do with how fast an object falls on a planet or moon .

So why did the flag on moon landings have ripples through it if theres no air resistance? It wasnt just a little bit either.

i `m probably just uneducated , but i was always told there was no gravity on the moon , and if that is true , not sure thats why i`m asking ,would not every thing on the moon fall to earth...?

There is sufficient gravity on the Moon to hold down an astronaut.

In actuality, everything on the moon is falling to Earth...

Add a comment