How did male and female first evolve?

12 January 2016



Can you explain how single-celled, self-replicating organisms evolved into male and female organisms that could procreate?


Kat Arney put this question to Ginny Smith...

Ginny - Yes, well. If we're going to talk about the origins of male and female, we do actually have to start by talking about the origins of sex because, of course, when at first it was all single celled organisms, they mainly reproduced through asexual reproduction. Bacteria, yeast, things like that still do it.

Kat - They split in two, don't they? One cell becomes two, becomes four...

Ginny - It's very, very quick. It's very, very easy. You don't have to bother finding someone else to do it with...

Kat - And buying them dinner and all that kind of stuff...

Ginny - So why did we stop doing it? Well the problem is, bad mutations can build up because you're just producing a clone of yourself. And it also means, if something new comes along - a new pathogen or a new environmental influence, it's going to wipe out the whole line. So it turned out that mixing your genes with another animal's genes is a much better way of producing offspring that are likely to survive. So sex was one of the best ways of doing this, and the first sexual encounters were likely to have been between two organisms that were effectively the same, not male or female, both somewhere inbetween. They just started swapping some information.

Kat - Because bacteria do this. They swap little things called plasmids. Tiny little bits of DNA they just sort of go - do you want some of that, here you go. And this is usually how antibiotic resistance spreads, doesn't it? It's carried on plasmids.

Ginny - Exactly, exactly. So that's kind of the first precursor to real sex. But, over time, many species then evolved to having two mating types - call them type A and type B. Now, we aren't quite sure why this happens, but it might be something to do with keeping our mitochondria in check because only one of the two parents now passes down mitochondria. We get all our mitochondria from our mother, so it may be that A and B evolved because one of them passed down the mitochondria and the other one didn't. Now once this had happened, it was an advantage for each of the mating types to specialise. So one type started making more smaller gametes and that meant that they could have more offspring because they could mate more easily with more of them, and the other one started putting all it's resources into ensuring the health of the offspring and the survival of the offspring they produced.

Kat - All it's basket in one egg!

Ginny - Exactly, yes. So that then over lots of time as they became more and more specialised...

Kat - Give it a billion years, and here we are...

Ginny - Became male and female and that, of course, leads to the choosy female - ardent male system that we see in most animals now. And, interestingly, there's some evidence that there's a real advantage to species that do that because it ensures that only the fittest males get to pass on their DNA and it improves the fitness of the next generation as a whole.

Kat - And certainly, as a woman, it means I get taken out for nice dinners!


So..."two organisms that were effectively the same, not male or female, both somewhere inbetween." Okaaay. And these semi-neuter freaks happened in every batch of organisms? Simultaneously? And these neuteroid organisims, like, found each other, so they could sorta, but not really, mate? How the heck does this work seeing as the female body of any species is generally considerably more complex than her male counterpart? How can this be classified as "science" seeing as it has never been observed, tested, verified or repeated? This ain't science, folks. It can't even be called a "theory." This is sheer fiction.

The female is form is generally more complicated; it's interesting that the default state of development is generally for an organism to adopt the female phenotype unless directed otherwise. For instance, men have nipples they don't need. Maleness is therefore a re-direction of development from the female default under the direction of signals originating, in the case of humans, from the Y chromosome. In many species, females can also reproduce clonally: greenfly, for example, can pop out tens of clones of themselves to swell numbers, but they can mate too. This suggests that, initially, reproduction was probably through a clonal mechanism (this reference is informative: But the benefits of sexual reproduction would have selected strongly in favour of a male form; how this would have arisen we don't know, but it must be early in the evolution of metazoal life because a wide range of organisms broadly spread across life's kingdoms all use the same mechanisms. 

Is this observable? Where did the intelligence come from, that made the single celled organisms think this through? Are single celled organisms still doing this today or are they continuing to reproduce like they always have? Could something as simple as a potato bug (which is actually an amazingly complex little critter) decide that it would be better to reproduce differently and given billions of years it would actually accomplish it and turn into something far different and even more intelligent and complex?? Why are males still males and females still females?

I was thinking the same thing,like how do you get make and female out of this. Why did animals grow a penis and then another grow a vagina and it just worked out perfectly??

Add a comment